CEO or Project Engineer: Value Of Behavioral Assessments

April 30, 2013 at 10:53 am 6 comments


More A/E firms are adding behavioral and personality assessments to their interview process. These tests or inventories “show” tendencies or ways that you are most likely to respond to your surroundings. Proponents say results from the assessments when used with a face to face interview will help predict a good “fit” between you and the job for which you are applying. These evaluations are standardized and carry statistical analysis to add to more commonly used conversational interviews. It has been reported that, unlike a normal interview, it is impossible to “cheat” on an assessment; impossible to answer questions that you think will give you a profile that an employer is seeking. And, you should not try to cheat. Eventually, your true personality will show itself. Firms believe the more they can discover about a persons strengths in personality as well as technical knowledge, the better the chance for a long term employment fit.

Recently I heard a story that shocked me! An executive shared with me one of his behavioral and personality assessment stories. After multiple interviews for a key leadership role in a mid-sized firm, the CEO asked him to meet with a psychologist for an assessment. As he entered the psychologist’s office, the CEO entered also and sat down. The psychologist began with his very in-depth assessment and the CEO remained. This is unethical and highly unusual. I asked the executive why he didn’t ask the CEO to leave or just stand up and walk out! Easy to think what we all would do but tougher when actually in the situation. Afterwards the executive candidate did tell the CEO it was inappropriate for him to have been in the assessment and he withdrew as a candidate.

Back in my graduate school days (many years ago) I recall writing a paper on the worst personality assessment tool I had come across. The test results were based upon which color you liked the best. The test had the validity of a newspaper horoscope. So as I was contemplating this blog, I took one of the common assessments utilized in our industry: The DISC assessment. Without going into too much detail, I will summarize: It was accurate. My chosen profession as an executive recruiter working with architects, engineers and scientists is a good fit!

In my experience, I have seen that when used accurately, various assessments can be helpful. However, often I have witnessed these tools to be used to knock out otherwise good candidates. Readers of the results often “see what they want to see.” They turn a positive attribute into a negative one. It is important that interpreters and users of the collected data be EDUCATED on how to use the information correctly and to weigh the results accurately!

Have you taken any assessments as part of an interview process? Which ones have you taken? Do you think it is invasive, helpful or neither? Do you think you were not offered a job because of testing?

Carol new profile

Carol Metzner
President, The MetznerGroup
Managing Partner, CivilEngineeringCentral.com
View Carol’s profile & connect with her on LinkedIn

civil engineering jobs :: civil engineering resumes :: civil engineering blog :: civil engineering discussion

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Career Development, Civil Engineering, civil engineering blog, Civil Engineering Companies, Civil Engineering Jobs, Corporate Recruiters, Human Resources, Interviewing, Recruiting, The Workplace. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , .

Civil Engineering Salaries: Does Yours Measure Up? Your Opinion – The Civil Engineering Economic Recovery

6 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Ryan Search  |  June 14, 2013 at 1:15 pm

    I heard a story today that both troubled me and made me angry. A recent graduate was asked to take the Disc profile and then told that the firm typically had two types within the firm.
    The whole point is to not “pigeonhole” people, but to understand them and meet them where they are.

    Most people using assessments do not understand what the assessment really says and how to use it.

    Sort of like putting a loaded pistol into the hands of a child.

    Reply
  • 2. Lisa lawson  |  June 14, 2013 at 5:49 am

    I agree. Firms are using these types of tools incorrectly. Tsk Tsk

    Reply
  • 3. Curtis B Wayne, Architect  |  May 6, 2013 at 10:12 pm

    This, like previous pre-employment tests, will pass. I was once given an polygraph test (now illegal) – although I was hired, it was a most unpleasant experience; I do not doubt that anyone who’s been given one of these psych tests will resent it – and the results will be deleterious to the firms using these tests.

    Reply
  • 4. gsbigger  |  May 6, 2013 at 11:03 am

    !) Has to be the right tool (tested/confirmed to measure fairly) – directly tied to defined/necessary aspects of the job – that can/does measure the attributes of the candidate – that fit that specific position – used the right way (compliant).
    2) Someone has to know how to select and use that type tool – in a compliant process.

    You may be a “green” when you start but could quickly turn “red” when the regulators and candidate’s attorneys check your fit as an HR professional (or C-level company leader). That is true whether or not a tool is used – and a bad hire (fit) is even more costly.

    Reply
  • 5. Dan Ryan  |  April 30, 2013 at 10:57 am

    I see this kind of trend to be troubling. More firms use these types of tools incorrectly than they do correctly and they would never stand up in a court of law if the validity of the process were to be challenged.

    Firms would be much better served to strengthen their interview process, including the addition of a behavioral component.

    Assessments are great tools when used correctly and when validated.

    This is not the case in most circumstances.

    Reply
    • 6. aepcentral  |  April 30, 2013 at 11:02 am

      “Firms would be much better served to strengthen their interview process, including the addition of a behavioral component”

      Absolutely agree with you Dan!

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

What’s Tweetin’…

Archives

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: